Friday, December 28, 2007
Those Shorts they Stuck
I salivate and all of the sudden need more money in the trading account to fulfill my plan for world domination. In 2008 I will rape and pillage.
Financials are going down again. Stayed away from shorting them recently for fear of a bounce. It's not coming and these stocks are making new lows. It will continue in waves and some exposure there is necessary. Leaning towards playing individual names as opposed to the XLF. Remember that the financials have been a market tell with great reliability.
The market got bashed. Dollar down hard. Bhutto assassination (Hello- Pakistan has nukes). Economic numbers continue to suck. Trannies are ugly. Metals flat to down.
Watch your ass here. If you are a bull you better plan to play defense. Like Boston Celtics defense. You better hold it down because the bears are coming with pitchforks and molotov cocktails. Good luck to you.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
So Here We Are Again...
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Today I Sat and Watched the Paint Dry
There are more longs on the watchlist lately. Oil names. Gold. Which by the way is breaking out of it's consolidation and awaiting the confirmation of new highs. Silver should also be watched closely for the big breakout. Silver could go nuts to the upside. Added more gold on Friday. My intention is to get bigger.
As for the market as a whole the bulls remain in control for the moment. Wait until the volume returns in January and we'll get a definitive direction one way or the other. The SPX and RUT sit at or near key levels.
We could go higher from here. I hate to say it but it could happen. It wouldn't take much to break the bears now. We are teetering. I'm ever so slightly net short. The financials could bounce and that is the key. Need to be more selective in shorting those names.
The consensus however now anticipates a January swoon. Financials get hammered again. If we get that scenario this market will break and it will be time to press your bets on the short side. The point is to have a plan for either scenario. Take what the market gives you and swim with the tide whenever possible.
Regardless of the near term machinations next year will be very interesting. Of that I'm certain.
Monday, December 24, 2007
BAH HUMBUG
It does you no good to fall in love with your positions. If you are getting hurt you need to move your feet. Period. Rule Number One: Control Your Losses. Obey this rule above all others. Close the damn position. Take your money and run when necessary. Any position closed can be re-opened under different circumstances. I've lost more money than I count being afraid of "missing the move". Screw that. Live to fight another day.
Five trading days left. I intend to preserve my profits (and keep my longest ever winning streak alive) if I have to close every single position I have. Period. No room for stubbornness- certainly a fault of mine.
Friday, December 21, 2007
Assume the Position
Some of this pop is RIMM. Some is OP/EX games.
Thoughts on Gold
Long Ideas? I've Been Drinking; It's Almost 3AM
and
This one I've been long for awhile. Takes time for one of these long term consolidation patterns to play out.
Here is one I'm waiting for. Anxiously.
Now for some of my mistakes. You won't believe it but I sold the below stock on Monday. The day before the +15% moonshot. Monday afternoon just randomly throwing shit into the fire. Well imagine my surprise Tuesday morning when gapped up four bucks. Then proceeded to go higher all day. I literally thought to myself when I sold- shoulda waited until it hit $48.50 on the downside since that was the plan. The plan- remember that hotshot? A bit more pain but no I figured I was wrong prematurely. Just throwin' it in the fire to watch it burn.
The sin on CRM is one of inaction. I've watched the stock closely and traded it successfully in the past. One of my better long trades of the year- pure rocket fuel. As soon as it cleared 57 1/2 it was flashing on my watchlist. Jumping off the page at me. I sat and watched. Sat and watched. Today it happened- the explanation point.
Screw Christmas. I'm ready for next year to start. Consider all these long ideas to be my holiday cheer because once that wears off the market is going to get creamed. Maybe it's all the booze in my coffee. Still net short but backing off a touch. The edge is close. Tangling with CCL again, stop is tight. Planning to close out my best year ever strong. I'm sprinting to the line after jogging the last mile. In 2008 fortunes will be made and lost.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
No Vacation Here
Next year is going to be very interesting. I'm going to bring my A-game.
Friday, December 14, 2007
Ben "Dover" Bernanke
This is just some shady, sleazy and unethical stuff here. I don't appreciate it and I was glad to see most of the gains come off as the day wore on. These sort of things increase the already substantial risk of being short in this market. But I for one sure as hell don't want to be long.
Bernanke shot his weapon this week. He has more ammunition but the Fed is losing credibility and it's about time. Again, they are a joke. This sort of underhanded delivery in addition to a plan lacking in transparency undermines confidence in the market place. This place is a banana republic. We need to see what the damage is- who is insolvent?- but the only efforts being made by the Treasury and Fed work to further obfuscate.
Today's (Thursday) action was nondescipt. Down big this morning only to rally back to flat- more or less. I covered some at the lows only because I was carrying a lot of risk (and they were down big) but I feel confident in my positions for the most part. Generally though I would prefer to have less skin in the game going into year end simply to preserve gains.
Yields have shot up this week and that bears watching. Dollar also bouncing. Metals got creamed today and I remain short term negative on them. Maintain insurance sized position but nothing speculative. Don't forget the highest month over month gain in the PPI since the 1970's. Whew! That's hot. Fed in a box. Friday we get CPI data.
If we are up much on the indexes I may be forced to take cover and live to fight another day. As much as I want to be banking coin while other traders are going on vacation- working hard when others aren't- wouldn't mind declaring victory and going kayaking.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Sorry Ben Try Again
FLIP. FLIP. FLIP. FLIP.
GAME OVER.
Pump Fading
However as the day wears on the pump is fading. The air is slowly being let out of the balloon. As I type we are sitting right on the key level for the S&P. 1493-ish. This must hold for the bulls. If not the bears may be back in control.
Considering my positioning coming into today I should have been taken out and shot at the open. It wasn't a pretty picture but I expected worse. By 10:30 it wasn't looking too bad. The loss at that point was manageable. I shorted a bit more. By 11 o'clock I had turned green on the day. Shorted some more. Now I'm solidly green and increasingly nervous (as the next bailout could come any time).
When you feel like you should be down HUGE and you aren't usually it's best to stick it out. We have these big up days where I should be getting killed but my losses are manageable. Tells me to be patient through the pain. Today, I feel as if Bernanke personally and deliberately tried to screw me. Has the feel of a hail mary. If anything the action today has emboldened me. I need the key support levels to fall or else I may regret putting so many chips on the table.
Bulls Demand Investing Be Risk-Free
The powers that be will pull out all the stops to keep this market elevated. Every crack in the dam will be met with another bailout attempt. There are no free markets. Comrade Bernanke will just make shit up if he has to. How about we buy up all the bad debt at par? Comrade Paulson will rewrite all the rules. Why don't we just throw out 200 years of contract law and rewrite contracts by government decree? These guys will purposely screw the short sellers.
Hence, money management will be key for bulls and bears alike. I can't stress enough how dangerous of an environment this has become for all market participants.
I, for one, still don't see how this can end well. There are delicious shorting opportunities everywhere but today may belong to the bulls as we look to retrace some of yesterday's big downdraft. I'm net short again and would look to get more aggressive if the bulls can't keep the ball.
Good luck folks. Be careful out there.
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Bears Back in the Driver's Seat
After high sticking and checking the bulls into the boards today I'm shutting the computer off and going to a hockey game. When I get home I'll have 4 or 5 hours of homework to look forward too. Then maybe I'll have a chance to post some further thoughts. Or perhaps not.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Further on the Freeze
"But unfortunately, the "freeze" is just another fraud - and like the other bailout proposals, it has nothing to do with U.S. house prices, with "working families," keeping people in their homes or any of that nonsense.
The sole goal of the freeze is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value - right now almost 10 times their market worth.
The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process.
And, to be sure, fraud is everywhere. It's in the loan application documents, and it's in the appraisals. There are e-mails and memos floating around showing that many people in banks, investment banks and appraisal companies - all the way up to senior management - knew about it."
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Brief Summary of Last Week's Trading
Big week for the bulls. Apparently the market is convinced that the bailout will make us all whole. We may have to throw out two hundred years of contract law but as long as the bull remains intact it all be OK. Sure. As a seller, this all leaves me feeling pretty demoralised. Hence my decision to basically go flat and sit on my hands after the big ramp job Wednesday.
Not thrilled to be net long. Not in any meaningful way but it's more or less a reflection of having covered nearly all my shorts. Good thing too. Nothing more dangerous than a wounded bull.
The short side was the right trade and I feel like I got de-balled by some bullshit bailout. But this sort of thing is to be expected if we are undergoing a trend change (and that's not a certainty at this point). The bulls will pull out all the stops to keep the run alive and staunch the selling. The averages will gyrate back and forth through the 200-dma until the psychology changes and reality sinks in. Don't underestimate our government's ability to dream up half-baked bailouts. This is two bailouts now (including the SIV bailout proposal).
Net-net I didn't make much of anything this week. Some beer money. Had I refused to acknowledge that the bulls had gained the advantage I could have lost myself a small fortune. Wednesday alone I gave back the equivalent of Zambia's GDP. So discipline won out over emotion and from that alone I derive comfort. I actually have some longs I'm excited about.
At some point I decided to ease off until year end and reflect. Unlikely that will stick but it sounds appealing after all of the nonsense last week. The market has unhitched itself from reality but that doesn't mean we can't go higher still. The consensus is that we will rally until January. Seems too cute and convenient to me but I'm in no mood to take the other side of that trade right now. It's been a phenomenal year. No sense in getting gored.
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Dennis Gartman on Mortgage Bailout
"Are contracts no longer to be viewed as law, but rather are to be viewed as nothing other than mere whim? If we are to allow mortgagees who are in trouble to stand down and have their problems taken up by taxpayers, what then of contracts anywhere? Can we demand foreign governments, or foreign companies, or foreign individuals to stand by their commitments to Americans if Americans will not stand by their commitments to one another?
"No one wants to see people put out from their homes. No one wants to see the television photo-op of poor people pushed from their homes at Christmastime, or in the depths of winter. No bank wants to take delivery of a foreclosed-upon home when it could be left in the hands of the former home owner, with the mortgage shortage to be worked out over time. But to have the government step in and mandate that homeowners be allowed, under penalty of law, to remain in their homes and for banks to be forced to accommodate is legal and philosophical madness.
"This is a country of law, which believes in the sanctity of contract agreed upon by those who've consented to the binding nature of that contract. If the parties involved wish to change the contract, and if agreement can be reached to do so, then it can and should be done. But to have government force the issue -- and worse, to mandate [that] taxpayer funds be used to do so -- is morally wrong, with implications that shall redound into any and all other economic concerns."
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
1-800-Hail-Mary
Monday, December 3, 2007
And the Week Begins Anew
Going through the watchlist this weekend left me feeling sort of agnostic in regards to near term market direction. The bulls have the potential for myriad exotic bailouts on their side and the bears have reality on theirs. Either can win in the short run.
Friday, November 30, 2007
Dipping a Toe
Airlines and commercial real estate stocks seem vulnerable.
The Fuse Has Been Lit
MORE:
Other states are experiencing similar problems on a smaller scale.
The Montana Board of Investments, which manages the state's money, has seen $247
million withdrawn by local governments in the past three days from a $2.5
billion money-market-like fund called the Short Term Investment Pool.
"We've had some local government withdrawals in the past few days because of reports
about Florida's problems," Carroll South, executive director at the Montana
Board of Investments, said in an interview on Thursday.
Rating agency Standard & Poor's warned last month that it could downgrade a $4.8 billion
investment pool run by King County, Wash., because of potential subprime exposures.
Preview
"The nation's subprime-mortgage crisis is prompting Florida cities, counties and agencies to pull billions of dollars out of a state-run investment fund.
They fear they could have lost their money because a state agency invested it in funds backed by loans to homeowners with questionable credit -- the same loans that have triggered an international credit crunch.
Governments and agencies typically take money intended to pay for such basics as teacher salaries or road repairs and invest it in the short-term state fund so they earn interest before the bills come due."
Here's where we are headed. The toxic waste is everywhere. I'm not kidding. Got to love Gov. Crist's response, which was basically, "Don't worry we'll bail you out."
Since Greenspan we've all become accustomed to bailouts. Seems like everyone gets bailed out. We have socialized risk. Meanwhile the profits are usually private. At some point this all becomes too big to bailout. Can we really bailout everyone at the same time? Who is going to bailout our government? China?
It's all one trade. The equity markets are at that same point, where we assume the bailout is coming to save us. The Fed will cut and save us. It always works right? Well I fail to see how problems that were created by easy money will be fixed by more easy money. Anyway here are the articles:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-bk-statefund112907,0,5698387.story?coll=orl_tab01_layout
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/state/orl-run2907nov29,0,138068.story
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Bears Get the Horns
Out was smart. For the moment anyway. I'm still out. Basically flat save for a small handful of positions. This way I'm not hostile and feeling under attack with the market going against me. Really I should have not only covered but went long today as well. Don't know why I felt it appropriate to be so arrogant as to shun easy low risk long trades. Bottom line is I don't trust the long side here. Our problems are just too big. It's important to be able to sleep at night.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
I'm Gone
Really I should have been out before the close yesterday but I was out of the office for the last half hour. Didn't expect such a big pump into the close. That will cost me. It hurts too. The best month ever for me is no longer. But I will admit when I'm on the wrong side. That is clearly now the case. I'll take my remaining profits and walk.
My watchlist for today has long ideas outnumbering short 2 to 1. Let me be clear though. This bounce has legs and could even last until year end. Does it change the big picture? No. I still think this is setting up the shorting opportunity of a lifetime. However, in the short run, you must trade the tape you are given. You are never smarter than the market.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Sucker Rally
Monday, November 26, 2007
Back to the Bloodletting
This market is damaged. No. This market is broken. Not technically though. Not yet. Soon enough.
The pain has just begun. Maybe the market can put in a double bottom here and vault higher. Though it feels to me that we are rolling over. A CLIFF!?
Tonight's watchlist provided 37 short and 13 long candidates. I'll be looking at the shorts and maybe adding to current positions. Cautiously now. The bounce is still out there waiting to trap the bears. Change in sentiment from uber-bullish to sanguine/nervous has me concerned but I don't yet smell fear. AAPL, GOOG and RIMM need to roll first. That may start real soon. Or not. I'll be watching those names more closely just the same.
Again the futures are being gunned upward tonight, speaking of a bounce. See, I'm scared. The short side has been too easy and when I'm hot, I'm nervous. Let's see if this one lasts any longer.
I had lots to be thankful for this year. Hope you did too. Even had Thanksgiving TWICE, on two different days, at our house and with me doing dishes.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
It's Everywhere!
Public School Funds Hit by SIV Debts Hidden in Investment Pools
By David EvansNov. 15 (Bloomberg) -
- Hal Wilson smiles at the blue numbers on his desktop screen. His money is yielding 5.77 percent. For the chief financial officer of Florida's Jefferson County school board, that means the $2.7 million of taxpayer funds he's placed in the state's Local Government Investment Pool is earning more on this October day than it would get in a money market fund. And Wilson says he knows the Florida officials who manage the funds of the 1,559-student district have invested them wisely. ``We're such a small school district,'' Wilson, 55, says. ``We don't have the time or staff for professional money management. They have lots of investment advisers. It's risk free and easy.'' It may be easy, but it's not risk free.
What Wilson didn't know in October -- and what thousands of municipal finance managers like him across the country still haven't been told -- is that state-run pools have parked taxpayers' money in some of the most confusing, opaque and illiquid debt investments ever devised. These include so-called structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, which are among the subprime mortgage debt-filled contrivances that have blown up at the biggest banks in the world.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Bad Day To Be a GSE
This last one is more of a tell on the economy.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Where's My Turkey?
Three days and five hours until turkey.
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Bring on the Turkey
Trading should be thin. Hopefully boring too. I've got stuff to do.
The consensus is that stocks will be bought based on the calender. Meanwhile the fundamentals are deteriorating around us. The weak bull case may win out in the short term. We could drift higher. Or not.
There are some stocks worth buying. Utilities and other defensive sectors look good. However, the warm fuzzy holiday market, if that's what we get, isn't likely to last long.
Full Disclosure: I hate Christmas.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Looking for the Rollover
There are a bunch of these stocks that have similar patterns though. So you have other choices. SLG, for instance, an old Ken Heebner favorite.
Agnostic
Again, rally or no, there isn't much I want to buy here.
However, at some point here in the near future, I think silver is going to go nuts to the upside. It's marking time here. I feel no immediate urgency to add to my position but somewhere in this neighborhood is where I want to do so. The point is not to get too cute trying to buy at just the right time. Maybe I'll scale into some more SLV starting today. Maybe not. Just know that at some point the SLV is going to $200. I really want to be on that train in a big way. I've been waiting a long time for this breakout.
I remain short financials. Again, as we have observed previously, the market correction over the last couple days was led by financials. This has happened repeatedly. They are acting as a tell on the market as a whole. Continue to watch them.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Perspective
At midday the market seems to be rolling over here. Metals are getting creamed too. Should be an interesting afternoon. I guess I'll be rooting for more downside.
Where's the Fear?
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Late Day Plunge, Nice for a Change
What I saw today was a lot of stocks that had already made their moves back to overhead resistance (formerly support). Therefore, low risk shorting opportunities were abundant. And still are, some of them.
We made several attempts at the magical 1490 level on the SPX. The bulls were lobbing hand grenades and the bears were armed with kitchen scissors. Sure enough the bulls ended the day origami.
Metals were strong. Dollar spent the day trading lower before closing flat. Yen was off 1%.
Everything basically worked for me today. Even the lottery ticket (short AAPL) paid off. The balance of the week should be very interesting. Option expiration Friday. Heads up folks.
Testing 1,2
Oh. Oh. Oh. I figured out how to put an image or chart on my page. What's up now?! Get up Estero! That only took 6 months. Bottom line is, and I often admit it, I have the mechanical aptitude of a 14-year-old girl. I'm pretty excited even though I'm probably still doing it wrong.
Update
Starting to dip my toe in on the short side again. Have lots of ideas.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Day of Massacre Redux
This sort of volatility is associated with bears, not bulls. After all the selling we were due for the big snap back.
Today actually hurt. I got smaller again and have enough buying power to choke a horse. Sure there was money on the long side but I'm not interested in that here.
Maybe this is the big bottom here and we vault to new highs. That would be surreal. I'd be wrong and late to the big party. Oh well. I'll make money long if I have to. Nothing wrong with being wrong. Your average trader is wrong half the time. Key to being wrong: admit it and move on. You have to have a plan that allows for you to be wrong. Live to fight another day.
Anyway, if new highs aren't in the cards, I'm happy to sit out this bounce. We'll see. I can't not play the game so I'm sure to deploy capital soon enough.
Fleckenstein's headline today was great: "Market upgraded from buy to grab!"
Mo-Mo No Mo'
RIMM down $10.62 (9.38%),
and wait for it. Wait for it. Yep,
GOOG down $31.90 (4.8%).
Mo-Mo names are broken. Hence the weakness in the NDX.
Monday, November 12, 2007
Day of Massacre
For those that are long the GLD (down 4%) or the SLV (down 6% +/-) today was painful indeed. I trimmed those positions into strength last week but still got pummelled. Mining shares were brutalized as well.
Then we had a fake market rally today with the DOW up triple digits at one point only to unmask itself into the close where we actually ended red to the tune of 55 pts. I covered some shorts this morning as I took down risk across the board.
Now long almost nothing. Some metals and the DBA. Sold COGN this morning when I was throwing things into the fire. Bought it Friday afternoon. Ha. Accept luck as luck and move on.
Still somewhat aggressively net short. But now I have lots of ammunition and virtually no leverage. Just feel like we could go either way here and I have very little conviction. My gut says that the market is going to crack but we could also get a violent (Santa Claus?) rally off of these lows.
On one hand I fear getting left behind on the short side if we go lower here and now. On the other, there will plenty of money to be made once (if) the market breaks. As a younger man I would have a hard time standing back from a position in fear that I would "miss it". Now I realize that there are opportunities every day, every week and the most important thing is to just "stay in the game".
My advice to you? Stay in the game. Peace.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Weekend Review
That's nothing. The NDX dropped 6.5% last WEEK. All of the mo-mo darlings (GOOG, AAPL, RIMM, etc.) got roughed up. That's important for market psychology. At some point investors will realize that technology will not recession-proof a portfolio. I'm short the cubes and AMZN.
I'm short the RUT via IWM and was a touch disappointed with the relatively quiet 3% drop. But that index still may look the worst of them all.
The dollar continued it's freefall. Yen was up 3%+. All week I liked the look of FXY and all week I passed it by in favor of other opportunities. Gold was UP 3%, crude was flat.
I don't have a clear feel for gold here. Keep thinking that it will correct but it has yet to do so. The fact that the equity markets got pummelled this week and gold was strong is a potentially important development insofar as gold needs to show it can trade on it's own, uncorrelated to equities. That may take some time. It seems extended in the short term. Silver has broken out and seems likely to go to $20/oz., but could also be overextended.
You could make the case for a bounce in equities next week. You could make the case for a crash in equities next week.
Certainly no one believes equities will go down during the holidays. Apparently, it's some sort of eleventh commandment. Seems a bit cute to me. Everything is unravelling but the true pain will be polite enough to wait until after we've all opened our presents?
I remain net short, somewhat aggressively. Going through my extensive watchlist this weekend, I don't see much of anything I would want to go long here. Nor do I see many stocks that I would really want to run out and short. I have only five names that excite me enough to initiate a position. All shorts. I'm probably about 65% of the way through my list of like 600 stocks.
No time to be a hero.
One thing that did leap out at me was European financials. They appear to be rolling over and may offer some opportunities next week as well. Perhaps it's setting in that the toxic paper isn't contained to just every US-based financial. We exported a lot of it too. Seems like widespread acceptance of that fact would provide the dollar a chance to bounce.
We should know more on Sunday night after Asia starts trading.
Friday, November 9, 2007
Morning Jibberish
Funny. On the big bounce off the lows yesterday I took a lot of risk of the table- covering profitable shorts. Smart to control your risk and protect hard "earned" gains. Thought we would get a bounce to retest 1490 on the SPX from below. Thing is, as I laid in the bathtub last night, I started thinking about the likelihood of a total rout in the indices. If we were ever to have some sort of crash-like event (and it's always a low probability) now would be the time.
We could literally fall off the edge of the table. I've had this anxious feeling all week in watching the tape. If the August lows don't hold watch out.
Now set to open lower (and with my decision yesterday afternoon not looking so smart) the question is how aggressive I want to get in chasing it down this morning. Have a list of about fifteen short candidates which I'll start nibbling at depending on pricing and I think I'll short the cubes (QQQQ) for the first time in a long time. That's really an opportunity I've been waiting for. Technology has been the port in the storm for the bulls. Once tech gets going to the downside we are in for some serious weakness. Saw the first signs of that yesterday. The mo-mo stocks were uniformly weak.
Speaking of mo-mo, I shorted AMZN yesterday. Small position affords me the luxury of not caring what it does in the next few sessions unless it approaches my stop price way overhead. Seems very unlikely. Meanwhile, if I'm right it's going to go much, much lower.
Just thinking out loud here but the point is that I would advise you to protect yourself. With the increasing volatility we are apt to swing violently in either direction. Even if we are going lower it likely won't happen all at once. Don't trust a wounded bull. It still has horns. Protect your gains!
But also keep in mind that if on one of these big down days we don't get the predictable afternoon bounce we could easily go down 500 points. Just something to think about.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Arrogance
In my case, my plan is not to daytrade. Period.
But...when my plan is making me lots of money, over an extended period of time, I think to myself, "Jeez I must be a frickin' genius..."
That's when the trouble starts. Daytrading equals trouble (in my case). Then... to amplify my mistake I'll trade a position that's way, way too big. Just broke another rule.
So when the trade goes against me a touch...I'm gone for an unnecessary loss.
Ofcourse had I held a bit longer the trade would have been wildly profitable. But that's beside the point.
Now written in black pen at the top of my trading notebook page: YOU ARE NOT A DAYTRADER!
Speaking of Gold
He received lots toys and clothes from our friends and family. What did daddy give him? Gold ofcourse.
He's getting richer by the day. Too bad the country in which he lives is becoming a banana republic.
Hope You Bought Some Gold
By Stanley White and Kosuke Goto
Enlarge Image/DetailsNov. 7 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar slid to record lows against the euro and the Canadian dollar on speculation China's plans to diversify its foreign exchange reserves will involve selling U.S. assets.
The currency slumped after Cheng Siwei, vice chairman of China's National People's Congress, told a conference in Beijing the country should improve the structure of its $1.43 trillion of foreign reserves by favoring stronger currencies. It pared losses after he later added that doesn't mean buying more euros. The dollar also slumped to a 26-year low against the pound and a 23-year low against the Australian dollar.
``Cheng Siwei, a China adviser, apparently said China should diversify into strong currencies,'' said Lee Wai Tuck, a currency strategist at Forecast Singapore Ltd. ``This is one of the comments that triggered the buying of the euro and selling of the dollar.''
The dollar slumped to $1.4666 per euro, the lowest since the 13-nation currency debuted in January 1999, before trading at $1.4615 at 11:31 a.m. in Tokyo from $1.4557 late yesterday. It fell to $1.0975 per Canadian dollar, the lowest since Canada's currency was floated in 1950.
Against the pound, the dollar declined to $2.0947, the lowest since May 1981. The currency slid against the Australian dollar to 93.75 U.S. cents, the lowest since April 1984 from 92.87 U.S. cents. The dollar may fall to $1.4700 per euro today, Lee forecast.
China Investment Corp., which manages the nation's $200 billion sovereign wealth fund, said last month it may get more of the nation's reserves to invest to improve returns.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Bernanke "Is A Nut!"
Highlights:
Rogers on Bernanke: "This man is a nut!"
On the secular bull market in commodities: "3rd or 4th inning..."
On gold: "I know I'll buy more."
On the Federal Reserve: "If I were Bernanke I would abolish the Fed and resign. It would be the best thing for the country."
Could not have said it better myself.
Friday, November 2, 2007
Fraud is Rampant
By SUSAN PULLIAMNovember 2, 2007; Page A1
Merrill Lynch & Co., in a bid to slash its exposure to risky mortgage-backed securities, has engaged in deals with hedge funds that may have been designed to delay the day of reckoning on losses, people close to the situation said.The transactions are among the issues likely to be examined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC is looking into how the Wall Street firm has been valuing, or "marking," its mortgage securities and how it has disclosed its positions to investors, a person familiar with the probe said. Regulators are scrutinizing whether Merrill knew its mortgage-related problem was bigger than what it indicated to investors throughout the summer.SCRAMBLING BULL•
The Issue: Merrill Lynch & Co. has been off-loading some of its mortgage-related assets to hedge funds as part of an effort to cap its exposures.•
Backdrop: Merrill's mortgage assets fueled a $7.9 billion third-quarter write-down, leading to the forced retirement on Tuesday of Chief Executive Stan O'Neal.•
Regulatory Question: Did some of Merrill's recent mortgage asset sales effectively postpone the reckoning for some write-downs?In one deal, a hedge fund bought $1 billion in commercial paper issued by a Merrill-related entity containing mortgages, a person close to the situation said. In exchange, the hedge fund had the right to sell back the commercial paper to Merrill itself after one year for a guaranteed minimum return, this person said.While the Merrill-related entity's assets and liabilities weren't on Merrill's own balance sheet, Merrill might have been required to take a write-down if the entity was unable to sell the commercial paper to other investors and suffered losses, the person said. The deal delayed that risk for a year, the person said.In a statement, a Merrill Lynch spokeswoman said, "We don't comment on specific transactions and we are confident in the appropriateness of our marks."At issue with any hedge-fund deals is whether there was an attempt by Merrill to sweep problems under the rug through private transactions kept out of view from investors. Some previous scandals, such as the collapse of Enron Corp. and the troubles of Japan's financial system in the 1990s, involved efforts to hide problems through off-balance-sheet transactions.
Ground Zero
Merrill has become ground zero of mortgage problems in the U.S. Last week, the firm announced a $7.9 billion write-down fueled by mortgage-related problems -- one of the largest known Wall Street losses in history -- after projecting just a few weeks earlier that the write-down would be $4.5 billion. Merrill also took a $463 million write-down, net of fees, for deal-related lending commitments, bringing the firm's total third-quarter write-down to $8.4 billion.A few days after the announcement, it ousted Stan O'Neal, its chief executive. Some analysts and others say they expect Merrill to take additional write-downs of roughly $4 billion in the fourth quarter.The rapid widening of Merrill's losses has led investors to wonder whether other banks and brokerages have a good grasp of their exposure to bad debt. Bank shares fell sharply yesterday, contributing to a 2.6% fall in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Merrill's shares fell $3.83, or 5.8%, to $62.19 in 4 p.m. trading on the New York Stock Exchange.Merrill's deals have attracted the interest of some mortgage investors and specialists.Making the Rounds"Merrill has been making the rounds asking hedge funds to engage in one-year off-balance-sheet credit facilities," Janet Tavakoli, who consults for investors about derivatives, told clients in a recent note. "One fund claimed that Merrill was offering a floor return (set buy-back price)," she said in the note, "so this risk would return to Merrill." Ms. Tavakoli said such transactions would explain how Merrill's mortgage-related exposure dropped in the third quarter.In recent weeks, Merrill has been scrambling to line up hedge funds to take as much as $5 billion in mortgage-related securities, people close to the situation said, part of what Merrill executives refer to as a "mitigation strategy." Under the strategy, which started earlier this year, Merrill has tried several means of lowering the risk of its exposure to mortgage-backed securities, these people say.In accounting for such transactions, "the general guiding principle is whether the benefits and risks of ownership were transferred," says Charles Niemeier, former chief accountant for the SEC's enforcement division and now a director of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Legal questions can arise if the seller retains some exposure to the risk of the assets losing value, and if the deal is designed to disguise the picture of a business's financial health.FROM THE ARCHIVE• U.S. Investors Face an Age of Murky Pricing10/12/07Jay Gould, a securities lawyer at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, says if a firm is unloading securities from its books "without a real commercial purpose other than to create a value for pricing purposes, that can be a problem."Other big securities firms with mortgage-related losses have arranged similar deals with hedge funds. As disclosed in a recent page-one article in The Wall Street Journal, Bear Stearns Cos. sold $1 billion of risky mortgage loans to a hedge fund under a one-year pact known as a "mandatory auction call." Bear Stearns agreed to participate in an auction for the loans that provided the hedge fund with a guaranteed minimum return.Three big U.S. banks are assembling a group of financial institutions to create an investment pool to buy some mortgage-related securities from "structured investment vehicles" that are being forced to sell. That effort, which is backed by the Treasury Department, has also led some investors to question whether the goal is to delay the point at which banks recognize losses on troubled assets. The banks say their aim is to forestall forced selling of the assets.In mid-July, before the credit crunch worsened, Merrill reported better-than-expected earnings with little impact from exposure to mortgage-backed securities. Asked about the firm's mortgage position on a call with analysts, Merrill Chief Financial Officer Jeff Edwards said: "Proactive aggressive risk management has put us in an exceptionally good position." Two weeks later, Mr. O'Neal personally sent an email to Merrill employees assuring them the firm had such risks well in hand.
Source of Problems
One source of problems was the First Franklin mortgage company, which Merrill bought in December 2006. First Franklin catered to subprime, or less credit-worthy, borrowers. Subprime loans have fallen sharply in value this year due to rising default rates.Another source was Merrill's underwriting of collateralized debt obligations, which are securities backed by pools of assets including mortgages. Merrill ranked No. 1 in the area from 2004 through 2006.By the end of June 2007, Merrill had CDO exposure of $32.1 billion and a subprime-mortgage exposure of $8.8 billion, totaling $40.9 billion. Much of the CDO exposure was in triple-A rated "super senior" slices. These were supposed to enjoy strong protection against defaults, but they began to decline steeply in price in late July.By the end of September, Merrill says it reduced such positions through sales, hedges and write-downs to $15.2 billion of CDOs and $5.7 billion of subprime mortgages, a total of $20.9 billion. The write-downs totaled $6.9 billion for CDOs and $1 billion for subprime mortgages.
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Down 360 on the DOW
More to come I'm guessing. Technology stocks are not going to drag the entire market higher when the financials are collapsing. Retail isn't looking so hot either. Builders and anything in the housing ATM food chain continue to leak deep crimson pools.
Hey bulls. Google won't save you. Neither will the Fed.
If the market decides to really go down (and we're overdue) there will be nowhere to hide. At least not in the short run.
We need to clear the dead wood. It's abundant and it's very dry. All it takes is a spark.
Was today that spark? Not knowable right now. The way to look at it is that the bulls are very determined to buy every dip. It's worked for so long that it will take time for the reality of trend change to set in and alter behavior.
Huge drops like the one today in CROX will help to change psychology. There have been many others in last couple weeks.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Latest From Jim Rogers
Bloomberg
``I'm in the process of -- I hope in the next few months -- getting all of my assets out of U.S. dollars,'' said Rogers, 65, who correctly predicted the commodities rally in 1999. ``I'm that pessimistic about what's happening in the U.S.''
Friday, October 19, 2007
Dow Drops 366, Nasdaq Down 74
After learning my lesson earlier in the week via my YHOO raping I was "smart" enough to cover a huge WB short and a modest COF short ahead of earnings. Ofcourse, they both got annihilated today. And, as I suspected their earnings sucked. Just goes to show you can't win. Tough market.
Unfortunately I was modestly long this morning. Like the bulls I sat watching my trading account balance slowly disintegrate before my eyes. Down a quick 2%, erasing yesterday's gains.
What did I do? Started selling longs and initiating shorts. Then I took a nap. It's Friday after all. Woke up and the market was still down 200+ but my balance had recovered- down only 1%.
Finished the day down 300 bucks. Ha! I could have easily lost 20 times that. So on one hand I'm patting myself on the back. On the other, I feel like I missed an opportunity to scalp the bulls for big profits today. Damn. I hate the bulls and I'm glad to not count myself amongst them today. Must say, I'm very excited to see my shorts working again after the parabolic rebound of the last few weeks.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Oil Closed at $89.15 Today. Whew!
We'll notice this sooner or later. As consumers that is. The crack spread has collapsed lately and higher per barrel prices have yet to translate in to higher prices for refined product. That won't last. Look for gas prices to head higher.
Geopolitical plays a role here too. Turkey suggesting an incursion into Iraq. Bush talking about WW3 with Iran/Russia. Fun stuff.
Rookie Mistake and Lesson Learned
Now in years past, during earnings season (of which we are in the midst with most major companies reporting this week), I closely followed upcoming earnings report. See, as a trader, it makes sense to avoid positions in which earnings are imminent. You have no advantage since you generally have no idea what the company is going to say.
Lately though I have suffered from news overload. Just decided I don't care much what's in the news. It's all so depressing. Especially when you interpret every piece of news as an indication of impending doom, as I'm apt to do. Long story short, I've not even noted upcoming earnings reports. Just don't care.
Well after initiating the YHOO position, that afternoon they reported. The numbers reported were not as awful as expected. That's the game- expectations. Despite the fact they suck and earnings were totally unspectacular YHOO stock popped $2.50 afterhours. Instant $750 loss- now I care.
So traders, watch for earnings reports! Don't make the same rookie mistake I just did.
Sucks. As per my discipline I have exited some of my favorite positions this AM. COF reports tonight. Covered my short. WB reports tomorrow morning before the bell. Covered my short. Fortunately they were both down big this morning giving me a nice opportunity to exit.
Sure I think there is a good chance WB in particular will not have anything good to say. But banks are black boxes, thanks to mark-to-make-believe accounting and other trickery they could report anything. No advantage for me. No reason to accept the risk of a violent move in reaction to the report.
As for YHOO...I'm gone. My thesis, a technical breakdown imminent, was immediately proven wrong by the market. I'm gone. Discipline folks. Live to fight another day.
Social Security Benefits to Rise 2.3%, Linked to Infation?
Now you can certainly argue that social security is a disaster. It is. And that we should just give people their money back and wrap the whole thing up. No young person who has thought about it, thinks there will be anything left for them in the way of "benefits". But there is no money there now either because Congress spent it already. Ha! Ugggh.
However, society does have some responsibility to those less fortunate. And the purposeful deception of our seniors is wrong. Where is the AARP on this?
Here's the link from Fixed News...Link. Where I lifted this brief explanation.
"The 2.3 percent increase in the cost-of-living adjustment that will go to 50 million Social Security recipients is the smallest in four years even though many prices are rising more quickly this year than last year.
Blame it on the vagaries of how the government computes the annual COLA. The price change is based on the amount the Consumer Price Index increases from July through September from one year to the next."
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Ugly TIC
FT.com
Worth keeping an eye on the somewhat slimish possibility, or perhaps inevitability, of substantial capital flight in the process of devaluing our currency.
M-LEC = FRAUD
"The proposal essentially transfers assets to a new entity, essentially a ``game of three-card Monte, where unrecognized losses keep getting shuffled around to hide them,'' said Joshua Rosner, a managing director at investment research firm Graham Fisher & Co. in New York. "
Monday, October 15, 2007
Get Involved
This petition is a touch over the top. However, considering the circumstances, strong language is warranted.
SignPetitionHere
Seriously.
Be Aware
Marc Faber on CNBC
Excerpt:
Mark Haines: So you think the US dollar is on par with the Zimbabwe dollar?
Marc Faber: It's not there yet. But...
FullInterview
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Broken Record Plays On
The Fed is stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one hand inflation is completely out of control. On the other the economy is clearly slowing as consumers who have relied over the last five years on mortgage equity withdrawal begin to fill up their credit cards. Don't even try to tell me that inflation is "contained". That's horseshit! As a matter of fact I'd go so far as to say that government inflation statistics are an outright fraud. However, it's these same bogus inflation numbers that have allowed the Fed to ease despite the fact they should be trapped.
The American people are nearly oblivious to this fraud. Sad as it is, at this point we are going to get what we deserve. Deserve? Yes. Just look at our politics. For example, the Democrats are using a 12-year-old boy to convince the public that the S-Chip health program should be extended. Granted, the S-Chip program is to the benefit of our children but still. Worse than that is the fact that the Republicans are actually attacking said 12-year-old boy. He just came out of a comma for christ sakes! Disgusting.
I will concede that in the latest Republican debate Ron Paul actually spoke to my issue- the currency/inflation- eloquently. That man is on the ball and he makes a lot of sense. Problem is he's polling like 2%. He's considered a joke. A pariah in his party. The people laughing at and belittling him are the same ones who scoff at Peter Schiff. The same ones who don't take my vehement warnings seriously. That's just about everyone. Yep. We deserve what's coming. Sad.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Dollar Weakness Attracts Modest Attention
Though Mr. Paulson has primary responsibility for American exchange rate policy, Federal Reserve officials have also made it clear that they are not worried about imminent inflationary dangers from a weaker dollar.
The Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, recently told a Congressional hearing that the dollar’s value remains strong in other ways. “The value of the currency can also be expressed in terms of what it can buy in domestic goods — the domestic inflation rate,” Mr. Bernanke said in response to questions about the dollar from Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas and a long-shot candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. Noting that inflation remains low, Mr. Bernanke suggested that the dollar’s weakness was not a source of concern to the Fed.
Democratic lawmakers, who have been quick to attack the Bush administration about most other economic policies, have said almost nothing about the currency’s decline.
To at least some European officials, worried that the soaring value of the euro will hurt European exports, the American silence has been thunderous.
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Fisher Points to the Elephant in the Room
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Weekend Wrap-Up
It seemed a foregone conclusion that the Fed would panic in the face of a slowing economy. However, the specific circumstances under which the Fed eased are very ominous. Oil is at an all-time high (in nominal terms). The dollar was sitting right at long term support following near perpetual weakness. Then they aggravated their gaffe by cutting more than expected. You hear Bernanke and these "governors" talking about managing "inflation expectations". They don't even manage inflation anymore but expectations? That should be easy since none of them see any inflation going forward. Absurd (bordering on criminal). Will they have the audacity to cut again?
The major stock indices have rebounded sharply. Momentum names remain strong. However, I suspect we will see continued weakness in the banks which is similar to what we saw trigger the last sell off. I remain skeptical but if banks go higher and the tape is making new highs I will remain cautiously long. Regardless, the play here is gold. Oil. Nothing fancy. Respect the market and don't let out too much rope.
Next week features an employment report Friday. It is fair to expect fireworks. This is truly a battle of the arrogant undefeated bulls and demoralized perpetually derided bears.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Friday, September 21, 2007
Thursday, September 20, 2007
'Sleepwalking Into Crisis'
Here are some highlights:
He accused the industry of having its head "in the sand" about the depletion of supplies, and warned: "We may be sleepwalking into a problem which is actually going to be very serious and it may be too late to do anything about it by the time we are fully aware."
In an interview with The Independent on Sunday ahead of his address to the Association for the Study of Peak Oil in Ireland this week, Lord Oxburgh, one of the most respected names in the energy industry, said a rapid increase in the price of oil was inevitable as demand continued to outstrip supply. He said: "We can probably go on extracting oil from the ground for a very long time, but it is going to get very expensive indeed.
The latest figures from the US Energy Information Administration show that global liquid fuels production in August was almost a million barrels per day lower than the same period in 2006.
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Marc Faber on Bloomberg
ClickHere
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Welcome To The 1970s
There was a few weeks where you almost had to give Ben Bernanke the benefit of the doubt. When he first cut the discount rate in response to the credit market turmoil it seemed like a reasonable move. Greenspan would have cut the Fed funds rate. Greenspan was a complete whore. So you figure Bernanke is attempting to act more responsibly. Then he says: "It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve--nor would it be appropriate--to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions." Those words actually came out of his lying mouth.
Well, today Bernanke proved that he is the Greenspan incarnate. Ofcourse we've known for a long time that the Fed would panic and slash rates in the face of a slowing economy. But the circumstances at this particular moment in time are especially insidious. Oil is at an all time high! All time high! The dollar is threatening a complete collapse having broken it's last support level. Well guess what, Bernanke just pushed the dollar over the cliff.
Let's put this in context. The Federal Reserve was founded with the primary objective of price stability. Control inflation. That is the mandate. Now we've devolved to the point where the Fed apparently doesn't give a damn about inflation.
You can bet that pushing the dollar over the cliff will have ramifications. To be felt by every single citizen of this country. There is no avoiding this now. You could probably paint the scenario...I guess, in which we impeach Bernanke and start jacking up rates in the face of a slowing economy. That's what it would take and the chances of that are virtually nil. That scenario wouldn't be pretty either but it's a whole lot better than what we're going to get.
Think $5/gal for gasoline. Think about your grocery bill doubling. Think about everything in Wal-Mart going up in price by 30%. That's all in our future. Kiss the middle class goodbye. They're history.
How did this happen? Bernanke wanted to bail out Wall Street. Pure and simple. Bernanke is a tool. A puppet. We just sacrificed the middle class of this country in an attempt to insure Wall Street players get their bonuses. Labor just got screwed again.
This rate cut will not even help the housing mess. Long term interest rates will be going higher not lower. Bernanke just made things worse for housing.
If I had the choice I would move my family out of this country right now. As it stands, that option is not on the table. It will be six years until it is. By then it will be too late and we'll be stuck here. That is my fear and such is my level of disgust that I am deadly serious. I would move-right now!
Folks, I suggest you take actions to protect yourself and your family. Get out of the dollar as much as possible.
Some Truth From The Nation
The Lies of Alan Greenspan
By: William Greider (TheNation)
Alan Greenspan has come back from the tomb of history to correct the record. He did not make any mistakes in his eighteen-year tenure as Federal Reserve chairman. He did not endorse the regressive Bush tax cuts of 2001 that pumped up the federal deficits and aggravated inequalities. He did not cause the housing bubble that is now in collapse. He did not ignore the stock market bubble that subsequently melted away and cost investors $6 trillion. He did not say the Iraq War is "largely about oil."
Check the record. These are all lies.
Greenspan's testimony endorsing the Bush tax cuts was extremely influential but now he wants to run away from it.
In the instance of Iraq, Greenspan is actually correcting his own memoir, The Age of Turbulence, which just came out. This weekend, newspapers reported provocative snippets from the book, including this: "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what every everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."
Wow, talk about your "inconvenient truth." Greenspan was blithely acknowledging what official Washington has always denied and the news media faithfully ignored. "Blood for oil." No, no, no, that's not what he meant, Greenspan corrected in a follow-up interview. [Bob Woodward in Monday's Washington Post] He was only saying that "taking out Saddam was essential" for "oil security" and the global economy.
Are you confused? Welcome to the world of slippery truth Greenspan has always lived in. He was the Maestro, as Bob Woodward's loving portrait dubbed him. Wall Street loved the Chairman best because the traders and bankers knew he was always on their side and would come to their rescue. The major news media treated him like an Old Testament prophet. Whatever the chairman said was carved on stone tablets, even when it didn't make any sense, as it often didn't.
Some of us who followed his tracks more closely, were not so kind. Harry Reid, now the Democratic Senate leader, said Greenspan was "one of the biggest political hacks in Washington." Amen. I called him "the one-eyed chairman" who could always spot reasons to stomp on the real economy of work and production, but was utterly blind to the destructive chaos in the financial system. No matter. The adoration of him was nearly universal.
Until now. The economic consequences of his rule are accumulating and even the dullest financial reporters are stumbling on crumbs of truth about Greenspan's legendary reign. It sowed profound and dangerous imbalances in the US economy. That's what happens when government power tips the balance in favor of capital over labor, favoring super-rich over middle class and poor, then holds it there for nearly a generation.
Things get out of whack and now the country is paying big time. A pity reporters and politicians didn't have the nerve to ask these questions when Greenspan was in power.
He retired only a year ago, but is already trying to revise the history. To explain away blunders that are now a financial crisis facing his successor. To rearrange the facts in exculpatory ways. To deny his right-wing ideological bias and his raw partisanship in behalf of the Bush Republicans.
The man is shrewd. He can see the conservative era he celebrated and helped to impose upon the American economy is in utter ruin. He is trying to get some distance from it before the blood splashes all over his reputation. Of course, he also came back to cash in--an $8 million advance for a book that is sure to be a huge bestseller. I don't want to be unkind, but Greenspan could have avoided all the embarrassing questions if his book was posthumous.
I haven't the read it yet. I have a hunch I am not going to like it.
Apparently I'm Not The Only One Concerned
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYBOOiT5mAO0&refer=home
Monday, September 17, 2007
Wake Up!
Britney Spears' lack of undergarments gets more airtime then the legitimate threats we face. For one, the global peak in oil production. Or the fact that our Federal Reserve is in the process of debasing our currency. Really hate to say it but we deserve what we are going to get. What are we going to get? Eventually, a wake-up call to the new reality. Just because we are collectively ignoring it doesn't mean everything is going to turn out just peachy.
Global terrorism? Who the hell cares. We lost 2,000 fellow Americans on 9/11. A tragic loss indeed but an American would have a better chance of winning the lottery then getting blown up by a terrorist in this country. Meanwhile, every single one of us is going to be affected when our dollar is virtually worthless.
Here is what to expect. Incredible price increases (measured in years not months) for all the things we need to sustain our current lifestyle. Oil, water, electricity, agricultural commodities just to name a few. Now is the time for us to wake up in order to have any chance of controlling our fate. I'm losing hope.
We'll eventually be confronted by this new reality. By then it will be too late. Future generations will wonder why it is that their parents and grandparents ignored these problems. They'll wonder how it is that we could have been so irresponsible and distracted by nonsense. We are going to hand down to our children a nation in shambles. As a new father, it all makes me so angry, that I just want to reach out and shake those around me. Wake Up! Before it's too late! I want to drive to Washington and burn down Bernanke's house for what I think he is about to do. I want to see Greenspan strung up in the town square.